Site Overlay

Nuremberg Trials 2.0- Great Britain

Nuremberg Trials 2.0- Great Britain

Nuremberg trials 2.0-the follow-up. I already wrote about the starting of the Nuremberg trials 2.0. Now Great Britain did the beginning. Sixteen dissidents are accused of the worst crimes, and more will follow. All governments, health organizations, doctors, nurses, and everyone who has participated in this crime.

Will These People Be Charged With Genocide?

Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the

International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against
humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression

The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates,
the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister
Boris Johnson, along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of
the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum

According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code
and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53 of the Rome Statute

The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the
“Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at
Nuremberg established ten standards to which doctors must conform when performing
experiments on human subjects

The ICC is a permanent, independent court investigating crimes that concern the
international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the
Rome Statute has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It
can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to
justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court,

According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic
and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:

“In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on
December 6 [2021], a courageous attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony
Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of
numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes
against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7,
8, 15, 21, and 53.”

The Dirty 16

In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:
1. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
2. Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
3. Bill Gates
4. Melinda Gates
5. Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
7. Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca+
8. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
9. Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
10. Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
11. Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
12. Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
13. Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social
14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare product
15. Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum

The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are “the peoples of the United
Kingdom.” One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president
and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.
At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming
mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know,
mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with
concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.
“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and
possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at
mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April

What Is the International Criminal Court?

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and
international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by
an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than
One hundred twenty countries, including the U.S.
The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the
international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against
humanity, and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to
cooperate with the court, but that doesn’t always happen.
If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of
crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate
legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield
the individual in question from criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint:

“We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English
Court system without success, we have been unable even to get the case
registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.
The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to
replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is
unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution
(Article 17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC
Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a
member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC
does not have its police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case,
defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the
Sixteen defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the
“Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at
Nuremberg established ten standards to which doctors must conform when performing
experiments on human subjects.
Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to
participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis
for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965,
which binds practicing physicians to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing
medical care.”
While not a binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a
source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which
recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom, and principles
of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.

Violation 2 — Genocide

Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Here, the group in
question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with
the elderly, chronically ill, and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:

Causing serious bodily or mental harm
Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility
Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial
All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each
charge. For example, concerning “conditions of life calculated to bring about
destruction,” this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth
through imposed lockdowns, and damaging people’s immune systems through the
refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates and coerce people to take the COVID

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity

Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes:


Imprisonment or severe deprivation of
physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law


Enforced sterilizations Persecution of any identifiable group

Apartheid and other inhumane acts

The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support

Violation 4 — War Crimes

War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a
covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world)
through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon,
mRNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.” They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the
intent to commit a crime, stating that:

“… the members of the U.K. government and world international leaders against
which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this
global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as
SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’
We submit, therefore, that the members of the U.K. government and world leaders
against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent
with respect to these alleged crimes.”

War crimes listed in the complaint include:

Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of
midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of
graphene hydroxide in the shots.
Not only are they asking for a full investigation into the inclusion of Graphene
hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, they also want a full investigation into the
the suspected assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist, and a top
graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral thesis described the conversion of Graphene.
Oxide into graphene hydroxide. According to the complaint:

“Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the University of Almeria, and
alongside Dr. Andreas Noack, he examined the covid ‘vaccines’ for the
presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study
of frequencies. According to both doctors, the vaccines don’t contain
graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide.

On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what
graphene hydroxide is and how the nanostructures injected into the human
body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients …

On November 18, 2020, Dr. Andreas Noack was on a ‘Livestream’ on
YouTube discussed the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ when he was
arrested on camera by armed German police. On 26th
November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about Graphene
oxide and graphene hydroxide, he was attacked and

We request a full investigation be done into the inclusion of Graphene
hydroxide in theCovid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the assassination of Dr.
Andreas Noack.”

Torture by way of forced mask-wearing, the use of test swabs containing
carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon.

Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples
include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID jab
mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare, the use of
biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative
treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm and euthanizing elderly
COVID patients with midazolam.

Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military
necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.

Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part
in any hostilities.

Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians,
damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the
natural environment.

Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression

The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under
Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:

“This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several
decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of
most nation-states, with a few exceptions.

It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum]
Davos, the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI, among others, are at the center of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the
President of the USA and the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the U.K.
As well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order through the U.N.‘s Agenda
2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled
by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of
the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium-sized businesses,
moving the market shares to the largest corporations owned by the Global
Elite. The fulfillment of this goal will most likely lead to the full enslavement of

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological
the weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and
all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws,
but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the
Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into
account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, the introduction of unlawful
vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein
currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a
court injunction.”

New Findings Will ‘Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry’

In a January 1, 2022, video announcement (featured at the top of this article), Dr. Reiner
Fuellmich — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and co-founder of the
German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer
Corona Untersuchungsausschuss) launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data
What they now have in their possession is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”

Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee
focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the
vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to experiment within an
experiment, unbeknownst to the public.

According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to
kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical
products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different

“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a
lawyer, of there being premeditation. ~ Dr. ReinerFuellmich”

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Council of Europe Health Committee they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an
investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for
100% of the rapid deaths.

In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some
having toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, 3,000 times above the baseline. Others
have toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batched with
no deaths attributed to them.

Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have
coordinated and synchronized their experimentation so that only one of them is
releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all
experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able
to do this is because no review boards are overseeing any of them.

There’s now an interesting site where you can search the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (VAERS) data based on your lot number to see if you got one of the
more dangerous batches. You can find that dashboard here.

“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation,”
Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, there is no legal immunity for
anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.

Without a doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so
many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t
mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the
criminals behind this global takeover to justice and hold them accountable for
everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health, and our children’s futures.

Final Thought( by Sylvia)

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Dr. Viviane Fischer have done great work collecting all the pieces of evidence. Great Britain is the first country to file an international case against these criminals, but more to come. Most of the dissidents are accused in several countries. Bill Gates is receiving the death penalty in India, a serious matter. You can see that these individuals have destroyed many lives. They feel secure, but they will never be able to visit a country they have damaged again.

We will now hopefully be witnesses to a greater trial, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials 2.0.

Dr. Joseph Mercola did a great job explaining and writing about the trials and the Nuremberg code!

I want to leave you with this excellent video from La Quinta Columna which is also following the way of Dr. Andreas Noack and Professor Dr. Pablo Campra.

To Your Health,



Please follow and like us:
Tweet 20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.